Macro Insights Weekly: A summer respite
From Russia-Ukraine to India-Pakistan, and not to mention US-China, recent developments point to a temporary easing of tensions.
Group Research - Econs13 May 2025
  • We will gladly take the return of the resulting risk-on mood.
  • US and China are on a 90-day remission period, with tariffs scaled back to pre-April 2 levels.
  • Both Russia-Ukraine and India-Pakistan cases show that even committed antagonists need respite.
  • These developments will surely be constructive for risk sentiments.
  • But once the temporary pause dates expire, many parties will have incentives for re-escalation.
Article image
Photo credit: Adobe Stock Photo
Read More

Commentary: A summer respite

From fearing a series of dislocations in the global geoeconomic landscape to breathing a collective sigh of relief over tactical pauses, there has been a welcome swing in market sentiments over the weekend. On Russia-Ukraine, the two sides appear more amenable toward a ceasefire and talks. India-Pakistan went through serious escalation of tensions last week, yet during the weekend appeared to step back from the brink. Any de-escalation of military conflict risks is welcome. Neither cases will be resolved soon, we are aware, but we appreciate that at least the latest developments are moves in the right direction.

On US-China, the talks out of Switzerland produced some quick results on early Monday morning, with some slashing of tariffs for the next 90-days. Compared to sky-high figures announced during early April’s tit-for-tat phase, the de-escalation is impressive. However, it needs to be noted that even this 90-day pause leaves tariffs at historically high levels.

By our preliminary estimates, given the baseline 10% tariff on the whole world and the various sectoral tariffs in place, US effective tariff on imports would be about 13% from today onward, a rate not seen since the early 1940s. Compare this with the less than 3% effective rate that prevailed as President trump took over this January.

As for China, when we add up the tariffs of Trump 1.0, Biden, and Trump 2.0, even after today’s pause, the effective rate on Chinese imports would be about 40%. Meanwhile, China’s retaliatory duties would fall to 10%, along with suspension of a variety of non-tariff countermeasures. 

We will gladly take the return of the resulting risk-on mood, but would remain wary of the fragility of the various détentes. Starting with US-China, the spike in fear caused since April may have abated, but the uncertainty about which sector will settle with which tariff will linger on. Indeed, given the proclivity of the US administration to scale back tariffs so readily, investors thinking about moving investments to the US would now have second thoughts.

Furthermore, the purported rationales for sky-high tariffs, that they would generate high-paying manufacturing jobs, that they would deepen the industrial supply chain in the US, and that they would create a revenue base to pay for generous tax cuts while still achieving fiscal consolidation, would remain. We would not put it past President Trump to revisit these objectives at the end of the 90-day pause. A sharp cutting of tariffs will not help these ostensible goals.     

On the two armed conflicts that are reaching a modicum of détente presently, the deep roots of antagonism won’t fade, and the risk of flaring up will remain substantial, we fear. Both conflicts transcend issues between just state-level actors, and there is a long road ahead for mutual trust to be re-established. A number of actors have incentives to re-escalate and undermine any truce. We don’t see a decisive turning of the tide in the near term.

For the summer months in the Northern Hemisphere, this weekend’s developments may well provide a much-needed breather. We have now seen that that even committed antagonists need occasional respite. We will hope for the pauses to outlast a few months, but prepare for only temporary relief.

FX market volatility

Last week was marked by headline-grabbing currency volatility in some markets. The Taiwan dollar had two intra-day downward (appreciation) moves against the USD of magnitudes never seen before. The Korean won displayed less drama, but even its intra-day moves were akin to the magnitude only seen during major financial or political events. After a stupor of few years, global currency markets have woken up with a start.

This year’s 10% or so move of the DXY has been the key story in the currency complex this year. The ripple effects of the world’s reserve currency going through a correction of such magnitude are many. For starters, currency vols have picked up across EM and DM as traders look at trade war implications, direct and indirect. The latest bout of volatility spike has been linked with growing concerns about some parties’ (e.g. Taiwanese insurers) unhedged exposure to the USD. As market participants see the need to hedge against dollar depreciation, that very act of hedging makes USD depreciation a self-fulfilling prophecy.

With trade war détente in place for the time being, the one-way path of dollar depreciation may have run its course. But the US administration will not give up on weaponising the dollar readily, in our view. Dollar volatility is here to stay, just like trade war will outlast the various pauses in place right now. 


To read the full report, click here to Download the PDF.

 

Taimur Baig, Ph.D.

Chief Economist - Global
[email protected]

Nathan Chow 

Senior Economist and Strategist - China & Hong Kong 
[email protected]


Subscribe here to receive our economics & macro strategy materials.
To unsubscribe, please click here.
 
 

Topic

Explore more

E & S WeeklyGlobal
Disclaimers and Important Notices

GENERAL DISCLOSURE/ DISCLAIMER (For Macroeconomics, Currencies, Interest Rates & Digital Assets)

The information herein is published by DBS Bank Ltd and/or DBS Bank (Hong Kong) Limited (each and/or collectively, the “Company”). It is based on information obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but the Company does not make any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to its accuracy, completeness, timeliness or correctness for any particular purpose. Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. This research is prepared for general circulation.  Any recommendation contained herein does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and the particular needs of any specific addressee. The information herein is published for the information of addressees only and is not to be taken in substitution for the exercise of judgement by addressees, who should obtain separate legal or financial advice. The Company, or any of its related companies or any individuals connected with the group accepts no liability for any direct, special, indirect, consequential, incidental damages or any other loss or damages of any kind arising from any use of the information herein (including any error, omission or misstatement herein, negligent or otherwise) or further communication thereof, even if the Company or any other person has been advised of the possibility thereof. The information herein is not to be construed as an offer or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any securities, futures, options or other financial instruments or to provide any investment advice or services. The Company and its associates, their directors, officers and/or employees may have positions or other interests in, and may effect transactions in securities mentioned herein and may also perform or seek to perform broking, investment banking and other banking or financial services for these companies.  The information herein is not directed to, or intended for distribution to or use by, any person or entity that is a citizen or resident of or located in any locality, state, country, or other jurisdiction (including but not limited to citizens or residents of the United States of America) where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to law or regulation.  The information is not an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security in any jurisdiction (including but not limited to the United States of America) where such an offer or solicitation would be contrary to law or regulation.

[#for Distribution in Singapore] This report is distributed in Singapore by DBS Bank Ltd (Company Regn. No. 196800306E) which is Exempt Financial Advisers as defined in the Financial Advisers Act and regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. DBS Bank Ltd may distribute reports produced by its respective foreign entities, affiliates or other foreign research houses pursuant to an arrangement under Regulation 32C of the Financial Advisers Regulations. Where the report is distributed in Singapore to a person who is not an Accredited Investor, Expert Investor or an Institutional Investor, DBS Bank Ltd accepts legal responsibility for the contents of the report to such persons only to the extent required by law. Singapore recipients should contact DBS Bank Ltd at 65-6878-8888 for matters arising from, or in connection with the report.

DBS Bank Ltd., 12 Marina Boulevard, Marina Bay Financial Centre Tower 3, Singapore 018982. Tel: 65-6878-8888. Company Registration No. 196800306E.

DBS Bank Ltd., Hong Kong Branch, a company incorporated in Singapore with limited liability. 18th Floor, The Center, 99 Queen’s Road Central, Central, Hong Kong SAR.

DBS Bank (Hong Kong) Limited, a company incorporated in Hong Kong with limited liability.  11th Floor, The Center, 99 Queen’s Road Central, Central, Hong Kong SAR.

Virtual currencies are highly speculative digital "virtual commodities", and are not currencies. It is not a financial product approved by the Taiwan Financial Supervisory Commission, and the safeguards of the existing investor protection regime does not apply.  The prices of virtual currencies may fluctuate greatly, and the investment risk is high. Before engaging in such transactions, the investor should carefully assess the risks, and seek its own independent advice.